On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:52:55 -0400 somitcw <[email protected]> wrote:
:>On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:14:38 -0400, Charles Mills <[email protected]> posted: :>> ORG *+3, DS XL3 or DS 3X seem good to me, FWIW. I don't perceive future :>>ORG problems, but I could be missing something. :>> Charles :>Thanks. :>DS would cause a strange issue to me. :>You don't want to know. :>If no one can recommend "ORG ," over "ORG *+3" I'll assume that :>"ORG *+3" is the best. :>For many decades, I've been using "ORG ," so it may be time for me to change? Explicit ORG is always better. The only good time for unexplicit ORG is when overlaying work areas (though I am sometimes sloppy with translate tables and use ORG , rather then ORG table+256 -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies.
