I think Tony Thigpen's meaning is clear, and Tony Harminc's question is specious. And while Ed may have a visceral aversion to "zapped" code, sometimes (meaning 1/billion) it's what you have to do. As for Ed's original issue, which is actually a developer deliberately violating coding standards, I'd suggest code reviews. I've only worked at one place that had them, but I've never worked at a place where they wouldn't be invaluable.
sas On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/10/2017 10:47 AM, Tony Harminc wrote: >> ... >> Which part is a good idea? I trust you don't mean sneaking in code >> from a higher architectural level than allowed by policy... > > > GOD I hope that's not what he means! Especially not the part where you ORG > back over an instruction to make it behave differently than coded! Yikes! > Did we just find another "cowboy?" >
