On 2017-12-09, at 18:48:22, Charles Mills wrote: > Really no better than what I suggested below, but for some reason I find the > following approach amusing. > > The OP's original plan was to include > > LABEL DC A(=x'123') > > in his table and then, presumably > > L Rn,LABEL > > in his executable code. Almost exactly the same effect could be achieved by > including > > LABEL LA Rn,=X'123' > > in the table and > > EX 0,LABEL > ... What if the OP intended the construct as a static initialization or default setting, possibly to be overlaid later by a different address?
-- gil
