ISPF edit's compare command has existed for many years and uses SUPERC under
the covers. Forget taking source off platform and give it a try. One of the
options is number of lines for syncing. If there is a problem with syncing
after changed lines, then look at the options. It worked great for code
reviews.
Regards, Jon.
On Monday, December 11, 2017 8:11 AM, Dave Wade <[email protected]>
wrote:
If you have "old source" and find "new updates" and have removed the sequence
numbers, then you probably can't easily work out how they applied...
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John McKown
> Sent: 11 December 2017 14:21
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more?
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This has been discussed and cussed many many times before. What's
> new?
> >
>
> Sorry, I don't remember that. I didn't think to search the archives. I will
> do
> that now and ask everyone's pardon.
>
>
>
> --
> I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it.
>
> Maranatha! <><
> John McKown
