I use a visual diff tool on Windows (similar more or less to SuperC if you are not familiar with diff) and it has little problem finding differences, even merging two sets of changes to a common base into a "superset" output -- with nary a sequence number in sight.
http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/ if anyone cares. I love it -- use it all the time. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Wade Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 8:11 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more? If you have "old source" and find "new updates" and have removed the sequence numbers, then you probably can't easily work out how they applied... Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: 11 December 2017 14:21 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more? > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This has been discussed and cussed many many times before. What's > new? > > > > Sorry, I don't remember that. I didn't think to search the archives. > I will do that now and ask everyone's pardon. > > > > -- > I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it. > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown
