Where can I find a description of FLOWASM? Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 6:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more? On 2017-12-11, at 17:50:07, Charles Mills wrote: > The trick, if you have a lot of errors to fix, is to do them from the bottom up. > .... > You know what I dislike: the PTF or release numbers in ~63 to 71, taking up a good fraction of the available comment area. > There's considerable motivation here for relaxing the 80-column restriction of HLASM. (How wide is your terminal nowadays?) This provided the impetus for FLOWASM. > On Monday, December 11, 2017 12:45 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > > The assembler errors give the absolute source line number in the input file. > They are unambiguous. > Unfortunately, FLOWASM obscures this information. -- gil
