Yes, among others. Supported by TSO EDIT and ISPF/PDF EDIT, although not by IEBUPDTE.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf of John McKown <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more? Like CLIST? Of course, I still don't much care for user supplied sequence numbers. I guess I've gotten to used to UNIX coding. On Dec 12, 2017 16:41, "Seymour J Metz" <[email protected]> wrote: > The obvious way to support RECFM=VB is for the first 8 columns after the > RDW to be the sequence number. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on > behalf of John McKown <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 8:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more? > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Rob van der Heij <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > It would be liberating to write HLASM wider than 61 columns, especially > > when doing structured assembler. It's an easy pipeline to fold the lines > > into 71+ for HLASM which could put the original line number * 100 or so > as > > sequence numbers. I normally assemble within XEDIT using the listing to > > steer the editor to the first line causing the error. > > > > I would love HLASM to natively support VB records, similar to "flowasm". > I used FLOWASM on occasion. And it is difficult at times to relate the > errors in the reformatted HLASM to the line in the FLOWASM input. What > might be nice would be something in HLASM akin to the C language's "#line" > where you can "reset" the line number to an arbitrary number and have HLASM > use that in its messages. > > > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > -- > I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove > it. > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown >
