Keven, As I said before, I wanted to know why it's not considered an exposure
now. I'm not interested in convincing anyone it's an exposure because it won't
help to answer my question.
Jon.
On Saturday, December 23, 2017 8:48 PM, Keven Hall <[email protected]>
wrote:Jon,It seems to me that what you’re saying is that if one works in a
badly run z/OS shop with unprotected UserIDs and unscrupulous employees who
share their user credentials then that might result in a security exposure. In
that regard z/OS is like any other system out there. Ultimately Your arguments
fail to convince me of the existence of any actual vulnerabilities in z/OS
itself.Keven
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, at 18:40, Jon Perryman wrote:
> I only wanted to know why dynalloc is no longer considered an exposure.
