Well, perhaps I should have written *limited* instead of limited.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 2:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Fair comparison C vs HLASM On 2018-01-29, at 11:55:56, Seymour J Metz wrote: > While the DOS I/O was very device dependent, there was the DTFDI with limited > device independence. > Insofar as "device independence" means restricting every device type to the capabilities of a card reader/punch. CMS is similarly limited. Pipelines adds some flexibility. -- gil
