That's one of the issues that format=flowed addresses. Of course, that only works if both ends support it, correctly.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 1:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Inconsistency with NILL vs. NILF (Is there any way you can fix your mailer to not hard-wrap listing lines. Enable Quoted-printable or something? It would be better to see: > 0000028C 0000 0000 00000000 481 NILL R15,-4 > ** ASMA031E Invalid immediate or mask field > > 00000290 C0FB FFFF FFF0 00000000 482 NILF R15,-16 ) On 2018-07-19, at 10:26:00, Steve Smith wrote: > > Well, I decided to check before complaining... and (surprise!): > > 0000028C 0000 0000 00000000 481 NILL > R15,-4 > ** ASMA031E Invalid immediate or mask field > What's it complaining about here? This catch-all message is woefully ambiguous. It would be better to supply a message explicitly stating the range limits being violated. In days of yore such detail was hardly necessary. The hardware is more complicated nowadays. > 00000290 C0FB FFFF FFF0 00000000 482 NILF > R15,-16 > 483 -- gil
