I hope that no programmer would use a non-relocatable expression as the first operand of an NI instruction.
The description I was commenting on seemed to refer to HLASM rules in general, not just to immediate operands. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 1:27 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu Subject: Re: Inconsistency with NILL vs. NILF On 2018-07-19, at 11:14:43, Seymour J Metz wrote: > Don't forget relocatable and complex relocatable expressions. > I nope that no programmer would use a relocatable expression as the operand of NI. Is that even supported? -- gil
