Steve, In my specific case, I cant add a LTORG requirement.
Although the macro I am working on is specific to our product, I have to provide a compatibility macro that converts another vendors macro to our macro. While I can require the customer to re-assemble, I don't want them to have to rework their existing code.
So, a new LTORG requirement is not something I think I can do. Tony Thigpen Steve Smith wrote on 11/8/21 7:27 AM:
It is not unreasonable to require your clients to provide a literal pool. It is not your problem, it's the user's. Even IBM accepted this, about 30 years ago, when relative-addressing was invented. Their macros require SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2 or higher to generate with literals instead of inline data, but that's pretty archaic now. sas
