Conceptually,the MVCL instruction could treat cases that specified the same 
register pair
for source and target operands as a request to clean or fill the designated 
storage area.


Keven 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 15, 2022, at 13:54, Mike Hochee <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I apparently stopped reading before the 'limited to 256' statement in the 
> original post and incorrectly assumed it covered long moves as well, since 
> you mentioned MVCL* type instructions (of course they cover all lengths).  I 
> see it being a lot more useful if it had long capabilities. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Tom Harper
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2022 2:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Next instruction needed
> 
> Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
> 
> I think that is unnecessary because the proposal is only for one to 256 bytes 
> so no need to make it interruptible. If you want to use for longer areas, use 
> a move long.
> 
> Many instructions have been added over the years for small items. This would 
> find significant use as soon as the instruction would become available 
> without dual pathing.
> 
> The cost to implement should be minimal.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>>> On Apr 15, 2022, at 1:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Apr 15, 2022, at 11:34:40, Tom Harper wrote:
>>> 
>>> If it was interrupted, where would the hardware restart? The instruction 
>>> itself cannot be changed.
>>> 
>> Make it an RFE.  Support it with a business case, that it would 
>> provide added value to end users inducing them to spend more on IBM 
>> equipment than the engineering cost of developing the new hardware.
>> 
>> --
>> gil
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the 
> information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended 
> recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise received 
> this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, review, 
> storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information contained 
> therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please 
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this email 
> message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email message or any or 
> all of the information contained therein. Although this email message and any 
> attachments or appended messages are believed to be free of any virus or 
> other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received 
> and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is 
> virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or 
> damage arising in any way from its opening or use.

Reply via email to