On 11/14/23 13:58:30, João Reginato wrote:
GilI know it works in the way you've proposed but I need to use the SETC in a very bigger macro. .
Please post an example showing the failure without the SETC. Would it be better to have two separate MACROs, one of which calls the other?
Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 17:46, Paul Gilmartin escreve:>>>> .I believe the SETC is unnecessary. How a bout just: MACRO &REST ZERO &N &REST SR &N,&N MEND START L ZERO 15 END
-- gil
