sublisted the same:
Loc Object Code Addr1 Addr2 Stmt Source Statement
HLASM R6.0 2023/11/14 18.26
1 MACRO
2 &NAME ZERO &N
3 LCLC &INS(2)
4 &INS(1) SETC 'SR '
5 &INS(2) SETC ' &N,&N'
6 &NAME &INS(1).&INS(2)
7 MEND
000000 00000 00000 8 XYZ CSECT
9 ABC ZERO 15
10+ABC SR 15,15
01-00006
** ASMA057E Undefined operation code - 00006/SR 15,15
** ASMA435I Record 6 in JOAO.QWASM.JOB09587.D0000101.? on volume:
11 END
Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 18:25, João Reginato <[email protected]>
escreveu:
> same error with 2 variables:
>
> Loc Object Code Addr1 Addr2 Stmt Source Statement
> HLASM R6.0 2023/11/14 18.23
> 1 MACRO
>
> 2 &NAME ZERO &N
>
> 3 LCLC &INS1,&INS2
>
> 4 &INS1 SETC 'SR '
>
> 5 &INS2 SETC ' &N,&N'
>
> 6 &NAME &INS1.&INS2
>
> 7 MEND
>
> 000000 00000 00000 8 XYZ CSECT
>
> 9 ABC ZERO 15
>
> 10+ABC SR 15,15
> 01-00006
> ** ASMA057E Undefined operation code - 00006/SR 15,15
>
> ** ASMA435I Record 6 in JOAO.QWASM.JOB09586.D0000101.? on volume:
>
>
>
> Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 18:20, Willy Jensen <
> [email protected]> escreveu:
>
>> Would a sublisted SETC do, where P(1) is the instruction and P(2) is the
>> register?
>>
>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>> Fra: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> På
>> vegne af João Reginato
>> Sendt: 14. november 2023 22:16
>> Til: [email protected]
>> Emne: Re: ASMA057E Undefined operation code SR 15,15
>>
>> without the SETC it works but I need it to simplify the logic of a bigger
>> macro.
>> .
>> João Reginato
>> (61) 9911-55500
>>
>>
>> Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 18:08, Paul Gilmartin <
>> [email protected]> escreveu:
>>
>> > On 11/14/23 13:58:30, João Reginato wrote:
>> > > Gil
>> > >
>> > > I know it works in the way you've proposed but I need to use the
>> > > SETC in
>> > a
>> > > very bigger macro.
>> > >.
>> > Please post an example showing the failure without the SETC.
>> >
>> > Would it be better to have two separate MACROs, one of which calls the
>> > other?
>> >
>> > >> Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 17:46, Paul Gilmartin escreve:>>>> .
>> > >>> I believe the SETC is unnecessary. How a bout just:
>> > >>> MACRO
>> > >>> &REST ZERO &N
>> > >>> &REST SR &N,&N
>> > >>> MEND
>> > >>>
>> > >>> START
>> > >>> L ZERO 15
>> > >>> END
>> >
>> > --
>> > gil
>> >
>>
>
