Although I know what SYSLIB, TSO, and ISPF are, I wouldn't know how to apply that suggestion in our z/VSE shop.
Oh, and add the COPY statement to that list of statements that would still show through PRINT OFF. So, instead of this: 153 * =================================================================== * 154 * MACROS * 155 * =================================================================== * 156 PRINT OFF 637 PRINT ON 638 * =================================================================== * I would like to see something like this: 153 * =================================================================== * 154 * MACROS * 155 * =================================================================== * 156 PRINT OFF,IDENTIFY 157 COPY IF 158= MACRO 159=&LBLNAME IF &A,&T,&B,&CONN,&C,&S,&D,&BAD 326= MACRO 327= AND &A,&T,&B,&CONN,&C,&S,&D,&BAD 417= MACRO 418= ELSE 434= MACRO 435= ENDIF 458= MACRO 459=&LBLNAME JK &DEST 462= MACRO 463=&LBLNAME JNK &DEST 467 COPY WHILE 468= MACRO 469=&LBLNAME WHILE &A,&T,&B,&CONN,&C,&S,&D,&BAD 596= MACRO 597= WLOOP 608= MACRO 609= WEXIT 620= MACRO 621= WEND 637 PRINT ON 638 * =================================================================== * Sincerely, Dave Clark -- int.ext: 91078 direct: (937) 531-6378 home: (937) 751-3300 Winsupply Group Services 3110 Kettering Boulevard Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA (937) 294-5331 On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:14 PM Paul Gilmartin < [email protected]> wrote: > On 5/28/24 10:02, David Clark wrote: > > ... > > Obviously, having copy names match is desirable. But, when there are > > multiple macros or dsects in a single copy source then it is not > possible. > > > > If y'all don't have a solution for this then it should be an enhancement > > request. > > . > An Idea for HLASM which should identify the catenand. > > Otherwise, replicate your SYSLIB allocation in TSO, > and use ISPF DDLIST M to find the origin. > > -- > gil >
