Well, I have a couple of assembler copy books that are 1000+ records in size. So normally the COPY statements are inside a PRINT OFF and PRINT ON set. Then if I get an assembly error inside those macros, I remove the PRINT OFF, reassemble and the I can most often identify the failing macro by the line number, which is shown.
Regards Willy -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> På vegne af David Clark Sendt: 28. maj 2024 18:03 Til: [email protected] Emne: Assembler Listing PRINT OFF Issue I think PRINT OFF is a bit too drastic. At the very least, any MACRO or DSECT statement that is included via COPY should be able to be shown in the assembler listing even if PRINT OFF is in effect. I understand why PRINT OFF is needed, but it also makes it difficult to identify the source of macros and dsects when they aren't even shown in the listing and copy names don't match. Obviously, having copy names match is desirable. But, when there are multiple macros or dsects in a single copy source then it is not possible. If y'all don't have a solution for this then it should be an enhancement request. Sincerely, Dave Clark -- int.ext: 91078 direct: (937) 531-6378 home: (937) 751-3300 Winsupply Group Services 3110 Kettering Boulevard Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA (937) 294-5331
