Andrew Macpherson, on 1/6/2008 5:16 AM, said the following: >> someone is willing to do the work...
> Not a sifficient reason. By itself, you would be correct, it isn't... but that it is just one of the main ones. > This is about SPAM not other messaging issies. By that argument we shouldn't be doing AV testing with ASSP either? What about file/attachment blocking based on file-type/extension? > 500k lines of source are complex enough. If you are a dev, then I suggest you take it up directly with the other dev(s). Otherwise, this kind of comment is irrelevant coming from a user. > Please kill stone dead this proposal. Since the main dev (Fritz) wants it, I think its too late for that - thank goodness... I'm thinking of the hours and hours - probably days, in total - I've wasted trying to convince brain-dead Outlook zombies to take 5 seconds and change a setting in their address book so they'd stop sending these things to my users. Sometimes I can convince them, others, I have to show my brain-dead users time and time again how to decode them. Luckily, over the last two years, these have slowed down dramatically - but I'm quite certain it will come around again, and I'd love to be able to simply not even know when it happens... :) > It is not appropriate What level would be appropriate? MTA? MUA? It is a tool. Use it - or don't. No one says you have to use all of the options or modules. -- Best regards, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
