On 5/5/2008, David le Blanc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > mail for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' delivered as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and mail for > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' delivered as > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.. > > (The first merely translates the domain part, the second directs an > entire domain and subdomains worth of email to a single user. more > specific cases would be an advantage for many.)
Yes, but doing it this way - unless I'm missing what you are saying - you totally lose one of the more valuable anti-spam tools - recipient validation. If you do apply something like this, be damn sure you don't bounce messages to unknown recipients *after* accepting them through one of these catch-call type addresses. -- Best regards, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
