Thanks for the quick reply and recognizing how critical this problem is for us.
I've got NotGreedyWhitelist set to 1 check all addresses - one match for white - add all Yet, I'm still getting plenty of bayesian flags from addresses that are alrady whitelisted. This was a problem before 0.5.04 (this is when notgreeywhitelist was on or off). I reported the problem and you fixed it in 0.5.04. In a version shortly thereafter, maybe even the 05/06 combo release, it broke again. Can you check what was changed in 04 and make sure that it's still that way in .14? If it is, it must be something else We've got bayesian set to BLOCK, not score, which is probably why we're seeing the errors in the block reports when score only people might not. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck <[email protected]> wrote: > This feature works like expected. > > whitelisted state is (was) never reached if: > > - any address is redlisted > - NotGreedyWhitelist == 1 > - NotGreedyWhitelist == 2 and MAIL FROM is not whitelisted > - if the sender has a local mail address > > Thomas > > > > > K Post <[email protected]> > 04.11.2009 20:12 > Bitte antworten an > ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > > > An > ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > Kopie > > Thema > [Assp-test] Whitelisted from addresses > > > > > > > Last thread "more on NotGreedyWhitelist" didn't get an indication if > the problem was going to be able to be fixed or if anyone else was > seeing the problem. > > Here's the issue, with 2.0.1 rc 0.5.13 whitelisted from addresseses in > the header that differ from non-whitelisted "mail from" addresses > don't seem to get a message to be considered to be from a whitelisted. > > This was supposed to have been fixed with 0.5.04 and I think I saw > that it was, but now it's happening again. I don't know what version > this started with again, but it's a real problem here. > > Any idea what could be wrong? This goes way too deep for me to be > able to help pinpoint a recommended change to the code. > > Thanks > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
