Sorry, I meant the first option (so 0, not 1) check all addresses - one match for white - add all
If set to 'check all addresses - one match for white - add all', one match in any of this fields is enough to get white and all addresses will be added to whitelist. So this means, provided that I'm understanding right, that if just one of the from addresses matches, that the message will be whitelisted. That's simply not what I'm seeing. Are other people possibly scoring instead of blocking on bayesian which is why they're not seeing the errors that I am. Clearly, our corpus isn't the greatest, or we wouldn't get these false positive bayesians, but having this notgreedy feature not working for us isn't helping the corpus learn... Could you kindly tell me what error you found with 0.5.04. The changelog at Fritz's site says: ASSP 2.0.1 RC 0.5.04 fixed: - whitelisted from is not detected and that's when it started working for me as advertised (short lived though). I'm sorry to keep pestering on this, but the code that controls this is way to complicated for me to follow. Thanks On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck <[email protected]> wrote: >>I've got NotGreedyWhitelist set to 1 >>check all addresses - one match for white - add all > > This is not possible. > > 'check all addresses - one match for white - add all' sets ' > NotGreedyWhitelist' to 0 > > I'll not change anything in sub onwhitelist, as long as nobody else is > reporting a problem there. > > Thomas > > > > > K Post <[email protected]> > 04.11.2009 21:08 > Bitte antworten an > ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > > > An > ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > Kopie > > Thema > Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Whitelisted from addresses > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick reply and recognizing how critical this problem is > for us. > > I've got NotGreedyWhitelist set to 1 > check all addresses - one match for white - add all > > Yet, I'm still getting plenty of bayesian flags from addresses that > are alrady whitelisted. > > This was a problem before 0.5.04 (this is when notgreeywhitelist was > on or off). I reported the problem and you fixed it in 0.5.04. In a > version shortly thereafter, maybe even the 05/06 combo release, it > broke again. > > Can you check what was changed in 04 and make sure that it's still > that way in .14? If it is, it must be something else > > We've got bayesian set to BLOCK, not score, which is probably why > we're seeing the errors in the block reports when score only people > might not. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck > <[email protected]> wrote: >> This feature works like expected. >> >> whitelisted state is (was) never reached if: >> >> - any address is redlisted >> - NotGreedyWhitelist == 1 >> - NotGreedyWhitelist == 2 and MAIL FROM is not whitelisted >> - if the sender has a local mail address >> >> Thomas >> >> >> >> >> K Post <[email protected]> >> 04.11.2009 20:12 >> Bitte antworten an >> ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> >> >> >> An >> ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> >> Kopie >> >> Thema >> [Assp-test] Whitelisted from addresses >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Last thread "more on NotGreedyWhitelist" didn't get an indication if >> the problem was going to be able to be fixed or if anyone else was >> seeing the problem. >> >> Here's the issue, with 2.0.1 rc 0.5.13 whitelisted from addresseses in >> the header that differ from non-whitelisted "mail from" addresses >> don't seem to get a message to be considered to be from a whitelisted. >> >> This was supposed to have been fixed with 0.5.04 and I think I saw >> that it was, but now it's happening again. I don't know what version >> this started with again, but it's a real problem here. >> >> Any idea what could be wrong? This goes way too deep for me to be >> able to help pinpoint a recommended change to the code. >> >> Thanks >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 >> 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus >> on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Assp-test mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test >> >> >> >> >> DISCLAIMER: >> ******************************************************* >> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, > legally >> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of > the >> >> individual to whom it is addressed. >> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no >> known virus in this email! >> ******************************************************* >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Assp-test mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
