On 11/25/2009, Thomas Eckardt/eck (thomas.ecka...@thockar.com) wrote: > My plan was to release the RC in july this year ... ? > There will be never a stabil version 2 with an even number at the end. > > - even = dev > - odd = production
Oh, right, I forgot about that... ;) > The first public release will be 2.0.1 1.0.0 - and I hope we'll get it > until end of this year. This part of the numbering system I don't get... Why not just make the release version 2.1.0, or even 2.0.1.0? Then minor updates will simply increment the 3rd (or 4th) number. I see no need to have a separate 3 digit set of numbers to denote the minor version. Then the next dev branch will start at 2.2.0, and go as high as necessary (2.2.9999?)... Mozilla tried the 4 number versioning system once, then reverted to the 3 number version when it never actually got used. Personally, I think the 3 number system just makes sense, and makes it (much) easier to see what version you're on. No biggie though - again, its only something to think about that I think would eliminate a lot of confusion - but I'll use whatever you do... :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
