Confused. Can someone explain. Did the OP add in "DOT" to obfuscate his post, or do spammers really use string literal of "dot" in their emails?
If they do, what's the point? They won't work, you can not resolve exampledotcom. Or, are they using HTML, and the HREF is a valid resource, but the HTML display is not? If that's the case, what is ASSP supposed to do, it's an edge case? ASSP need only uribl strings it can identify based on what rfc states is a valid URI. Outside of that, Bayesian or something else must take over. In the case of the OP, would one rule to block on a pattern of "dotcom/" catch all these? What are the chances that is used in a real email? Or fine tune it to make sure it is between an > and < HTML angle bracket. I must be missing the obvious here. -- Scott Iphone says hello. On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Thomas Eckardt/eck <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com > wrote: > Or what about the following URL's and possible words in any language > > http://optusfabrics DOTcom/brokenly.html > http://optusfabricsDOT com/brokenly.html > http://optusfabrics DOT com/brokenly.html > http://optusfabrics!DOT!com/brokenly.html > http://optusfabrics<DOT>com/brokenly.html > http://optusfabrics D O T com/brokenly.html > http://optusfabrics D!O!T com/brokenly.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
