I think we all speeking about different things!

>So, the 99 users who believe that the message is black

I speek about the Whitelist - (not black, blue or yellow ....) . If a 
there is a negative personal entry in the Whitelist, this meens only, that 
the sender is not whitelisted for this recipient - nothing else.

>So, the 99 users who believe that the message

Until now, all have to live with the decission of one person, that an 
address is whitelisted.

Thomas




Von:    Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve Mallindine) <st...@sc.ru.ru>
An:     GrayHat <gray...@gmx.net>, ASSP development mailing list 
<assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
Datum:  04.05.2010 17:33
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] test for personal whitelist wanted



So, the 99 users who believe that the message is black should each add 
a rule (in the case of outlook/exchange) or add to personal BL because 
of 1 minority guy who believes it should be white? (And in the case of 
multiple recepients, this 1 guy wouldn't get it anyway)

Sorry, but it reminds me of Spock... 'the needs of the many out-weighs 
the needs of the few...or the one'

However, I do think there's a good solution somewhere (that fits all 
scenarios)... We just haven't found it yet :)

What if: when multiple receipents are received, each is checked in 
whitelist for sender/recepient match. If matched, put into whitelist 
array, if not, blacklist array. Then, the message could be passed for 
the whitelist array, dropped for the blacklist array. Just a thought.

Steve

Sent from my iPhone

On 04.05.2010, at 14:25, "GrayHat" <gray...@gmx.net> wrote:

>>> someone doesn't want to receive some messages (s)he may just add
>>> a given sender to his/her personal BL (which will probably be
>>> smaller)
>
>> But this (personal blacklist) is provided by every mail client - or
>> not?
>
> That's different; if you do it at client level then you'll have to
> accept the
> incoming email and then let the client handle it; also, and since we 
> are
> at it, a personal whitelist (or blacklist) may be "cool" but I wonder
> how
> it may impact on the ASSP corpus, see, let's say 100 users decided
> that a given email is JUNK and ONE decided it's fine and he wants it,
> now, ASSP will be forced to accept such a message and it will end
> up in the notspam corpus... and this in turn may *pollute* it
>
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to