> I think this methode is better than having a 'notSpamLoversRe', because a > matching entry in this 'notSpamLoversRe' will revert every matched > spamloverRe entry - not only one.
Thanks for the suggestion. However I'd rather have something like a notspamloverre because otherwise I'd have to enter that regex, often times almost duplicated, all over the place. Easier just to put it once in one file IMO. To each their own :) Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 [email protected] 301-600-2399/x12399 > From: Thomas Eckardt <[email protected]> > Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:45:51 +0200 > To: ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex? > > Paul, you can try the following regular expression in spamLoverRe: > > (?=.*?\b(good1|good2|good3)\b)(?!.*?(?:(\b(?:bad1|bad2|bad3|bad4)\b).*?(?!\g{- > 1})){digit > of bad count}) > > where good1, good2, good3 are the good words, which consider 'spamlover' > > but only > > if the bad words bad1, bad2, bad3, bad4 will not be found a 'digits of > bad count' times > > for example: > > If you want to consider a mail 'spamlover', if it contains any of the > words 'blue' or 'white' - > but not if it contains additional 'black' , 'yellow' , 'green' , 'red' (in > any combination) at least three times - than > > (?=.*?\b(blue|white)\b)(?!.*?(?:(\b(?:black|yellow|green|red)\b).*?(?!\g{-1})) > {3}) > > should do it. > > I think this methode is better than having a 'notSpamLoversRe', because a > matching entry in this 'notSpamLoversRe' will revert every matched > spamloverRe entry - not only one. > > > > Thomas > > > > Von: "Paul K. Dickson" <[email protected]> > An: ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > Datum: 24.05.2010 21:43 > Betreff: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex? > > > > I there a way to do that? For instance, I want 90% of mail to be spam > lover > that contains word N. However, there are a fair amount of mails that come > in that have word N in it that are also obviously spam by other vulgar > words > in them. > > So I¹m in a bit of a catch 22 situation. Love all mail w/ word N in it no > matter how vulgar or spammy, resulting in 10% of it being nasty spam, or > remove word N from spamloverre and risk getting mail I want tagged but > passed completely blocked. > > > > Is there a way to say ³use spamloverre EXCEPT if it contains X bad > word(s)²? > > > > > Paul K. Dickson > Systems Administrator > Interagency Information Technologies > Frederick County Government > Frederick, MD 21701 > [email protected] > 301-600-2399/x12399 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
