Wow. Thanks!
Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 > From: Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> > Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:45:42 +0200 > To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex? > > Paul, > > make your spamloversRe file this way. > > <START> > assp-do-not-optimize-regex > # if you use V2 - > # write the line above anywhere > # to prevent assp from trying > # to optimize this file (regex) > .... > # any regex of your choice > .... > .... > ### begin of the selection part > # the first good word must be > # at the end of the first line > (?=.*?(\bblue\b > another word > .... > # any regex is possible in this part > .... > additional word(s) > .... > # the last good and the first bad > # word must be in this line > # at the begin and end > \bwhite\b))(?!.*?(?:(\b(?:\bblack\b > \byellow\b > .... > \bgreen\b > .... > # You may also include some other file with some > # realy bad words (e.g.) > # include files/blackre.txt > .... > # the last bad word must be > # at the begin of this line > \bred\b)).*?(?!\g{-1})){3}) > ### end of the selection part > # now can follow the next/different part > # of the regex - > # if you want, in the same way like above > .... > .... > <EOF> > > Not absolute sure, but I think it works. This way you have it as flexible > as possible. > You can add and delete words like before. > > Thomas > > > > Von: "Paul K. Dickson" <pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov> > An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum: 25.05.2010 15:53 > Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another > regex? > > > >> I think this methode is better than having a 'notSpamLoversRe', because > a >> matching entry in this 'notSpamLoversRe' will revert every matched >> spamloverRe entry - not only one. > > Thanks for the suggestion. However I'd rather have something like a > notspamloverre because otherwise I'd have to enter that regex, often times > almost duplicated, all over the place. Easier just to put it once in one > file IMO. To each their own :) > > > Paul K. Dickson > Systems Administrator > Interagency Information Technologies > Frederick County Government > Frederick, MD 21701 > pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov > 301-600-2399/x12399 > > > >> From: Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> >> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list > <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> >> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:45:51 +0200 >> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> >> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex? >> >> Paul, you can try the following regular expression in spamLoverRe: >> >> > (?=.*?\b(good1|good2|good3)\b)(?!.*?(?:(\b(?:bad1|bad2|bad3|bad4)\b).*?(?!\g{- >> 1})){digit >> of bad count}) >> >> where good1, good2, good3 are the good words, which consider 'spamlover' >> >> but only >> >> if the bad words bad1, bad2, bad3, bad4 will not be found a 'digits of >> bad count' times >> >> for example: >> >> If you want to consider a mail 'spamlover', if it contains any of the >> words 'blue' or 'white' - >> but not if it contains additional 'black' , 'yellow' , 'green' , 'red' > (in >> any combination) at least three times - than >> >> > (?=.*?\b(blue|white)\b)(?!.*?(?:(\b(?:black|yellow|green|red)\b).*?(?!\g{-1})) >> {3}) >> >> should do it. >> >> I think this methode is better than having a 'notSpamLoversRe', because > a >> matching entry in this 'notSpamLoversRe' will revert every matched >> spamloverRe entry - not only one. >> >> >> >> Thomas >> >> >> >> Von: "Paul K. Dickson" <pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov> >> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> >> Datum: 24.05.2010 21:43 >> Betreff: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex? >> >> >> >> I there a way to do that? For instance, I want 90% of mail to be spam >> lover >> that contains word N. However, there are a fair amount of mails that > come >> in that have word N in it that are also obviously spam by other vulgar >> words >> in them. >> >> So I¹m in a bit of a catch 22 situation. Love all mail w/ word N in it > no >> matter how vulgar or spammy, resulting in 10% of it being nasty spam, or >> remove word N from spamloverre and risk getting mail I want tagged but >> passed completely blocked. >> >> >> >> Is there a way to say ³use spamloverre EXCEPT if it contains X bad >> word(s)²? >> >> >> >> >> Paul K. Dickson >> Systems Administrator >> Interagency Information Technologies >> Frederick County Government >> Frederick, MD 21701 >> pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov >> 301-600-2399/x12399 >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Assp-test mailing list >> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test >> >> >> >> DISCLAIMER: >> ******************************************************* >> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, > legally >> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of > the >> >> individual to whom it is addressed. >> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no >> known virus in this email! >> ******************************************************* >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Assp-test mailing list >> Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test