Hello I tested it some day 1.9.5.0 (0.0.10) with rebuildspamdb 2.9.5.0. I noticed an increase of spam passing (from none/rare to 6-8 per day) and the reason is always due to the negative score (I suppose due to spamdberror) .
X-Assp-Score: 43 (Bayesian Probability: 0.9825) X-Assp-Score: -9 ([scoring:-9] Bayesian Reports Probability: 0.0000) probably is better to use spamdberror only to assign positive X-Assp-Score scores (avoiding negative scores which are making passing more spam than usual) . Graziano > There is new feature in 1.9.5.0 (0.0.10). > (Needs rebuildspamdb 2.9.5.0) > > The spam/ham reports will be used to build a second spamdb called > spamdberror. > A second Bayesian analysis will be done based on this second spamdb. > baysValencePB_error is weighted with the second probabilty if>= > spamprob or< 1-spamprob. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
