I was appreciating baysValencePB_error, no spam at all for days using baysValencePB to 42 , baysValencePB_error to 10 and messagescoring ; latest hours (since I started latest version without baysValencePB_error) four spam passed without change settings. Without baysValencePB_error I need to use baysValencePB to 46 to have the same effects (with the risk to block some good email however).
Graziano > ASSP development mailing list<[email protected]> > schreibt: >> has baysValencePB_error and spamdberror been removed in latest devs ? > > Yes, not useful. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
