Well that'll do it! I incorrectly thought all these years that "no processing" actually meant NO processing. Looking back, the NWLI options have only been a choice for 11 years!!!! I'm surprised I never caught this happening (correctly) before.
I agree that it the gui doesn't say anywhere that noProcessing isn't processed by the penaltybox, but it's literally called NoProcessing, not less processing, etc, hence my confusion. GUI says: Mail solely to or from any of these addresses are proxied without processing. The envelope sender and recipients are checked. Like a more efficient version of Spam-Lovers & redlist combined. Accepts specific addresses (u...@domain.com), user parts (user) or entire domains (@ domain.com). Wildcards are supported (fribo*@domain.com). If you register TO addresses here, all recipients for a single mail must be marked as noprocessing to flag the mail as "noprocessing". My money says that 90%+ of the admins using ASSP have the same misperception as I do on this. I suggest we add: Note: Messages flagged as "no processing" will not contribute to the corpus and will not be scored based on Bayesian/HMM detection. However, by default, "Penalty Box" / Bomb scroing will still take place. See !!!NWLI!!! option to override this default behavior. On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 4:25 AM Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > >*(not sure why this line is in the log twice)* > > because the string was found twice > > > >*msg rejected, even though no processing* > > I can't find anything in the manual, which states that 'noprocessing' > mails are not processed by the penaltybox > > Scores are added by the bomb feature, because assp is configured to score > noprocessing mails. > bombReNP > or > ....=>NWLI is used (N at least for this regex) > > Thomas > > > > > > Von: "K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An: "ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum: 17.10.2021 02:02 > Betreff: [Assp-test] Does Message Score build from Bomb matches > override a DKIMNP match?? > ------------------------------ > > > > I had an inbound message rejected by ASSP, where the DKIM signature > matched DKIMNP. I would have thought that if there's a DKIMNP match, that > the message will just be passed and saved in discarded. > > Also, Senderbase is white for the network that it came from. so that > should have reduced the score by a lot. > > There was a bombDataRE match. seemingly twice for the same line. and also > in BombData. I've got Dear Friend, in both files by mistake, that'll be > fixed, but that pushed the score above 50, so it was rejected. Shouldn't > DKIMNP override the rejection though? > > Here's the log, with my notes: > > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org *DKIM-Signature > found* > Info: enhanced Originated IP detection ignored IP's: 102.xxx.yyy.85 > (connected IP) , 10.11.74.34 > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org info: > found DKIM signature identity '@*bounce.TheirDomain.com* > <http://bounce.theirdomain.com/>' > @*bounce.TheirDomain.com* <http://bounce.theirdomain.com/> @ > *bounce.TheirDomain.com* <http://bounce.theirdomain.com/> > ,u...@ourchairty.org matches *.TheirDomain.com in DKIMNPAddresses* > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org [scoring] > DKIM signature verified-OK - header-passed - identity is: @ > *bounce.TheirDomain.com* <http://bounce.theirdomain.com/> - sender policy > is: neutral - author policy s: neutral - *state changed to: noprocessing* > Info: weighted regex (bombDataRe) result found for 'Dear Friend,' - with > 'dear friend,' - weight is 0.5 *<-- we get a lot of Dear Friend, > garbage, so I have it in BombData with a 50% score* > Info: weighted regex (bombDataRe) result found for 'Dear Friend,' - with > 'dear friend,' - weight is 0.5 *(not sure why this line is in the log > twice)* > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org spambomb > Regex: bombDataRe 'PB 18: for Dear Friend,' > msg11890-19574 [BombData] 102.xxx.yyy.85 < > *bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org [scoring] > (BombData 'Dear Friend,') > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org > Message-Score: added 18 for Regex: bombDataRe 'PB 18: for Dear Friend,' > BombData: 'Dear Friend,', total score for this message is now 18 > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org spambomb > Regex: bombRe 'PB 35: for Dear Friend' > msg11890-19574 [BombData][bombRe] 102.xxx.yyy.85 < > *bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org [scoring] > (bombRe 'Dear Friend') > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org > Message-Score: added 35 for Regex: bombRe 'PB 35: for Dear Friend' bombRe: > 'Dear Friend', total score for this message is now 53 > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org deleting > spamming safelisted tuplet: (102.xxx.yyy.0,*bounce.TheirDomain.com* > <http://bounce.theirdomain.com/>) age: 1s > msg11890-19574 [MessageLimit] 102.xxx.yyy.85 < > *bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org [spam > found] (*MessageScore 53, limit 50*) [Our Newsletter October 15th 2021] > -> messages/discarded/Our__Newsletter_October_15th_2021--254778.txt; > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org* [SMTP > Error] 554 5.7.1* [PE] rejected msg [PR] [msg11890-19574 212EA668] *<-- > msg rejected, even though no processing* > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org info: > PB-IP-Score for '102.xxx.yyy.0' is 53, added 53 in this session > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org finished > message - received DATA size: 138.82 kByte - sent DATA size: 0 Byte > msg11890-19574 102.xxx.yyy.85 <*bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com* > <bounce_ab...@bounce.theirdomain.com>> to: u...@ourchairty.org > disconnected: session:212EA668 102.xxx.yyy.85 - processing time 2 seconds > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test >
_______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
