SF is having large problems with most of their lists at the moment.
I'll repost my original message here followed by my response to your
question below:
My ASSP instances (v1.2.3(0)) all hang immediately after receiving a
message from a particular address. The following is the last log
excerpt before the hang:
Jul-25-06 15:34:33 69.16.230.72 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] passing is safe
because testmode, otherwise Bayesian spam
This same message has crashed ASSP a few times today. Any idea how to
figure out what's going on? No, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not the real address.
It's been changed to protect the innocent. :^)
Reply to question below:
I believe it's SRS-related due to the strange form(s) of the sending
address and the fact that I've had problems in the past with the SRS
module crashing on a non-standard address format. If anyone suspects
otherwise, please let me know.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micheal
Espinola Jr
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 9:35 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Another ASSP crash
>I don't have the details from your original crash posting. What
versions, modules in use, etc, are you running? I don't see why from
this posting you believe it is SRS-related.
List Receiver wrote:
> I had another ASSP crash overnight, caused by seemingly a similar
> problem as indicated in my last message. Here's the log file:
>
> Jul-26-06 04:54:30 70.103.190.72 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> whitelisting triplet:
> (70.103.190.0,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> waited: 20m
> Jul-26-06 04:55:58 70.103.190.72 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Validate Sender: Missing PTR record
> Jul-26-06 04:55:58 70.103.190.72 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> deleting spamming whitelisted tuplet:
> (70.103.190.0,miceleash.com) age: 1m 28s
> Jul-26-06 04:55:58 Service stopping
>
> Again, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is changed to protect the real address. The
> sending address was not modified, however. At least this time there
> was a log entry indicating the service was stopping.
>
> Is this and the previous problem related? Are they both still in the
> SRS module?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and
> earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEV
> DEV _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
V
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
