Lars Troen wrote: > Micheal, > I don't think this would be a good fit in all organizations. We avoided > using the testmode completely and it didn't put a huge burden upon me to > sort things out. In our old systems (before running ASSP in full > production) I setup forwarding on certain spam harvesting addresses so > that they would be delivered to the ASSP server. I also routed outgoing > email through assp so the whitelist could get built and the notspam > corpus could get built. After 1,5 month I had enough content in my > corpus so I could run ASSP without the need for disturbing my users with > these things.
No argument there. But the sendAllSpam address could still be utilized without having to resort to manual file manipulation. The point I was trying to drive home is that it can all be done through the email interface. "Internet Chicago Staff" seemed to be under the impression that this was not possible. I take it by your description that you did not have incoming mail route through ASSP during your setup phase? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
