>>In case someone has an easier & more intuitive solution that I don't >>see. I >>tend to sometimes find complicated solutions to easy problems >>(typical >>engineer that i am!) and so just wanted to double check that I wasn't >>off my >>rocker. > > My experience is, if somebody thinks, that is the way to do it, he > will follow it, regardless what I say.
*laugh* Undoubtedly, a fair assessment. > I would just use rbl alone for 4 weeks to get a nice corpus and > bayesian in testmode and ccallspam to train ASSP myself without any > user. Put some spamadresses into the mix and there you are. Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't bayesian testmode still require users to report invalid emails? And hence the exact problem that I am trying to circumvent? > Additionally you may ask someone from your country if he would share > his spamdb file with you. That is a brilliant idea Fritz. Does anyone have a well trained North American spamdb file (Northern East Coast, if that makes a difference) that they would like to share? Thanks! Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
