It could be good for something like this if you want to have it Bayesian tested.
-- ME2 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: "Nick Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, Dec 6, 2006 12:49 am Subject: Re: [Assp-user] When to report IsNoSpam vs. IsWhitelist? > "Micheal Espinola Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > Fritz Borgstedt wrote: >>> Surely a read-only mailing list is where you would want to use >>> >> Non Processing > > I agree with Fritz. I don't trust the content of > mailing/distribution/automated lists. I NP most of them. > If you don't trust the content, why do you NP them? NoProcess would simply skip all content filters.... But wouldn't whitelist also accomplish the same thing? > Eric Am I missing something here? - I am under the impression that the RedList is good for this. Ie, 'won't corrupt your non-spam collection or whitelist' but still has basic content checking (bombre et al) I used to whitelist them (eg .sourceforge. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
