A little late on the reply, but I also agree that removing the Bayesian filter is a terrible idea, exactly for the reason stated below.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of geode Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 8:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Assp-user] URIBL Marrco wrote: > > > and if i had to call one dead feature to drop from assp in 2007, i'd say > bayesian filtering. YMMV > > According to the stats on my test server, eliminating bayesian filtering would mean at least a thirty percent increase in SPAM messages. Why do you think it should be dropped? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/URIBL-tf2895089.html#a8097839 Sent from the assp-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE V _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
