Bennett Lee wrote: > LOL...yes, that's exactly what I was looking for. I spent all this > morning confused and looking back over PB and all the ASSP settings, > until I finally re-read the PB wiki to find out that PB is exactly what > I thought--a score that applies to the server. > > I'm still interested in the individual e-mail score--it just makes sense > to me. Virtually all the spam I get fail multiple tests, primarily > DNSBL and then either SURBL or spam bombs. And, frankly, without the > latter two, what good would spam be if the spammer didn't include either > a link or an embedded picture containing hidden text--someway so he can > collect his money? On the other hand, the false positives I see only > fail one test, usually a temporary DNSBL. DNSBL is a huge probability > of spam, but it's not always right. Thus, I want to rely heavily on it, > but I don't want to make it a flat out pass/fail.
That what the Bayesian analysis if for. If you want to apply more specific weights that you can control, instead of it being dynamically calculated by Bayesian - then switch to SpamAssassin. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
