> I'm going to attempt to perform some testing between the two > engines.Using an identical spam/ham corpus, I hope to train both filters > to see which is more effective in catching spam. I promise no results, > as I'm hardly savvy at this sort of thing, but I'll do what I can.
I used DSPAM about 2 yrs ago for a short time. Its accuracy was not as good as advertised, but it was not bad... But, it was 1000 times more difficult to set up and maintain. The *only* potential thing that it has that ASSP doesn't is per-user settings/quarantine. As someone else pointed out, this generally only matters to large installs like ISPs, where their customers 'demand' it. As far as I'm concerned, ASSP is much more accurate, doesn't take nearly as long to train, and is far, far easier to install/configure/maintain. > Again, no insult or injury intended, just honest, open conversation. Ok, you're forgiven... -- Best regards, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
