Matti Haack wrote:
> Hello Fritz,
> 
> what  do  you  think  of  the  idea to add the possibility to test the
> clamav results against an regex. If it matches, a different per message
> score could be added.
> So  it  would  be possible to give the sanesecurity (or other not 100%
> proofed signatures) viruses a lower score than the clamd viruses.
> 
> maybe somethig like
> "suspicious virus regex"
> If  a  clamd  result  matches  this expression the virus found will be
> scored with the "suspicious virus score"
> 
> "suspicious virus score"
> score to add if the suspicous virus regex mathced the clamd output

We don't score Virus hits, they are only blocked. Fritz says he does not 
see a valid reason to change this, i agree.

Kevin

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to