David wrote: > I'm glad you get it! These optional clamav definitions are really great. > Since a virus hit will outright kill a message, it would be cool to be > able to have clamd scanning higher up in the queue so as to avoid > extraneous scanning, too.
Other than Bayesian (for me at least) the ClamAV tests are the most CPU intensive. Moving it up would only increase load. P.S. top-posting? > Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: >> David wrote: >> >>> I hope that covered everything. >>> >> Totally. Thanks for that. I think I'm caught up with the >> conversation/issue now! >> >> I can see the point of what you mean now. The regex scoring is >> intriguing. I don't use ASSP that way, but I'm interested to see how >> this conversation turns out. >> >> Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
