I find that Bayesian is great, but that I get the best results by relying on many of the other checks. I loved the scoring that was introduced to reduce the false positives resulting from Bayesian mistakes.
Just my opinion across a few domains and sites. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen van Aart Sent: Friday, 14 September 2007 5:27 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Next official stable release? Greg Wright wrote: > I personally would prefer a more complex, but capable software package > than one that wasn't updated to the newest threats, or better ways. > Certainly the logging is improving too, for the better. Thing is the vast majority of spam emails are filtered out by the bayesian filter. At least here, about 90% or more. So adding lots of new features is nice, but won't do much decreasing spam. It's not a bad idea to stick with an older version you know works for you. Greetings, Jeroen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
