William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:33 -0500, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > >> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> >>> Seems I am having to put more copies in errors/notspam than before. And >>> even then, it's still now allowing subsequent ones through. Like some >>> damn bizjournals.com mailings. But according to the mail analyzer, it's >>> due to their excessive use of - or etc. They surround entries/news >>> articles with a line of those above and beyond. Seems to be the reason >>> those get rejected. >>> >> Instead of fighting that battle with Bayesian, I would suggest that >> you utilize other features such as noProcessingDomains to ignore >> pseudo-spammy (yet OK) messages entirely. >> > > As I shed a tear. I am trying hard man! I am using other features, but > they aren't working to well for me :( If they were my Bayesian spam > would go down as it has before. > > It was cut by like 2/3's or 3/4's when I upgraded to 1.2.x. Thanks to > the newer features, delaying, pb, smtp connnection limiting. Some of the > other newer ones in 1.3.x I have activated are helping. But self > defeated by other bugs :(. Suggestion: move your existing assp to a temp folder and perform a fresh install. Copy back your corpus. Then, using your previous config as a reference, reset your network settings to work properly. Identify which parameters were using external files and copy those over as well. Do a rebuildspamdb - and then see what happens. I solved a number of problems myself by doing this.
-- Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
