On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:04 +0100, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > >What's odd is in the past emails from the sender came through fine. > >They > >change things a bit on the senders end. Which I thought threw off the > >training/Bayesian db. And thought it was just a matter of retraining. > >But obviously there is more to it. > > > Bayesian is 80% good whitelisting. > > Is the sender whitelisted or not? > > I mean the real sender, not the "from" field content.
Yes that was the very first thing I did. Was to make sure the email was white listed. Along with any others the sender might elect to use. I also advise clients anytime they have someone report an email was rejected. To send the email to assp via the email interface to be added to the white list. It's very odd, otherwise wouldn't even bring it up :) -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
