On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 10:30 +0100, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > > And the message with "shrubbed" headers showed exactly that: a > whitelisted mail which was *not* caught as spam, therefore *no* spam > headers.
UM, but where did those headers come from? I got them from an email sitting in my spam folder. AFTER it was rejected to the sender as spam. So this email WAS rejected as Bayesian spam. Minutes after it was rejected to the sender. I analyzed the headers, and made the post here. I found out per a script I have running to catch things shortly after they are rejected or etc. Not sure how you are assuming it's not being caught as spam? Sender got the standard rejected due to unsolicited spam or etc response from server. Email ended up in notspam folder? End recipient did not receive the email, due to ASSP's actions. > To see if there is a problem, you should use the ccmail feature and > show us a spam mail (with headers) and the corresponding log entries. That is spam directly from notspam folder. Less the email body which was truncated due to the 10k limit. I am considering setting up a spam drop email account and wading through that. But don't see the headers being any different. Other than additional stuff to get the spam to my inbox for review. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
