Hitting "Apply Changes" in the Web GUI should do it. Travis Forghani wrote: > If i rename my cfg, how do I get ASSP to create a default cfg? > > sincerely, > > Travis Forghani > IT Administrator > Bowman Enterprises, Inc. > > Cell: 919-795-9298 > Office: 919-894-3662, Ext. 34 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly > prohibited by law. If you have received this communication in error, please > notify me immediately. > > > > > Daniel L. Miller wrote: >> Travis Forghani wrote: >> >>> Fritz and Others, >>> >>> I've got everything in testmode because I only have Bayesian and SPF >>> configured and enabled. Everything else is either disabled or has >>> default settings. The reason I have so many tests in testmode is >>> because I don't want to use them. The user in question is not in the >>> spam lovers, she is not part of the collect list (only have one address >>> acting as collect and it starts with a G). I've checked both. She is >>> not part of the redlist. I've even checked to see if the from addresses >>> of the spam are in the whitelist; they are not. So what exactly does >>> X-Assp-Block: NO (Testmode) mean? I understand that the emails are not >>> being blocked because of testmode; though as you stated, if it is one of >>> the tests that are in test mode it would say Spamlover or DNSBL. >>> Finally, what do the options All Test Mode and Spam Address Test Mode >>> mean and do. I've got All Test Mode unchecked (I assume it means that >>> all tests are in testmode); I've got Spam Address Test Mode checked. >>> >>> >> Testmode processes the e-mail with the particular test - but it doesn't >> BLOCK the message. I've never seen the X-Assp-Block header before - so >> I'd also like to know what it indicates. >> >> My guess, and I'm only guessing, is that you'd see such headers in a >> form of ASSP CC mail - where the intent is the admin is getting copies >> of the processed mail and Assp is indicating whether or not this message >> was blocked from the intended recipient. >> >> When you're having problems like this, one of the best solutions is to >> rename your assp.cfg, and let ASSP rebuild it with defaults, then just >> fill in your network information again. Anywhere you have a field that >> would contain a list of information can use an external file - which I >> recommend (for things like whitelisted domains, no-processing, >> spamlovers, etc. ). So just set those fields accordingly. >> >> Leave the tests alone at the defaults for a bit and see what happens. >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
