I've looked at CC and it is completely disabled as I don't have a single 
option configured in that section; spam lover is the same as CC.

sincerely,

Travis Forghani
IT Administrator
Bowman Enterprises, Inc.

Cell: 919-795-9298
Office: 919-894-3662, Ext. 34

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited by law.  
If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately.




Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>   
>> Travis Forghani wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Fritz and Others,
>>>
>>> I've got everything in testmode because I only have Bayesian and SPF 
>>> configured and enabled.  Everything else is either disabled or has 
>>> default settings.  The reason I have so many tests in testmode is 
>>> because I don't want to use them.  The user in question is not in the 
>>> spam lovers, she is not part of the collect list (only have one address 
>>> acting as collect and it starts with a G).  I've checked both.  She is 
>>> not part of the redlist.  I've even checked to see if the from addresses 
>>> of the spam are in the whitelist; they are not.  So what exactly does 
>>> X-Assp-Block: NO (Testmode) mean?  I understand that the emails are not 
>>> being blocked because of testmode; though as you stated, if it is one of 
>>> the tests that are in test mode it would say Spamlover or DNSBL.  
>>> Finally, what do the options All Test Mode and Spam Address Test Mode 
>>> mean and do.  I've got All Test Mode unchecked (I assume it means that 
>>> all tests are in testmode); I've got Spam Address Test Mode checked.
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> Testmode processes the e-mail with the particular test - but it doesn't 
>> BLOCK the message.  I've never seen the X-Assp-Block header before - so 
>> I'd also like to know what it indicates.
>>
>> My guess, and I'm only guessing, is that you'd see such headers in a 
>> form of ASSP CC mail - where the intent is the admin is getting copies 
>> of the processed mail and Assp is indicating whether or not this message 
>> was blocked from the intended recipient.
>>
>> When you're having problems like this, one of the best solutions is to 
>> rename your assp.cfg, and let ASSP rebuild it with defaults, then just 
>> fill in your network information again.  Anywhere you have a field that 
>> would contain a list of information can use an external file - which I 
>> recommend (for things like whitelisted domains, no-processing, 
>> spamlovers, etc. ).  So just set those fields accordingly.
>>
>> Leave the tests alone at the defaults for a bit and see what happens.
>>   
>>     
> On re-reading your previous post, I also recommend you take a hard look 
> at both the spam lover and the cc fields - it sure sounds like your user 
> is getting ASSP cc mail.
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to