Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > <[email protected]> schreibt: >> I just enabled SPF and pretty much right away I had a legit email >> (TimeWarner Cable) rejected because of SPF timeout. What exactly does >> this mean and why is the default for SPF timeout (SPFtout) enabled? > > > 99% or more with timeout is spam. > > If you enabled SPF, is it to much to go through the options, read them > and activate to your liking? >
No it's not much, but that isn't the point. Default settings are supposed to be safe. It seems to me that failing SPF timeouts is not safe. Does this not mean that if my DNS is a little slow to respond, that the SPF will timeout, and then fail? I don't see how 99% of timeouts could be spam, unless I'm not understanding why it's timing-out. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
