Fritz Borgstedt wrote: >> Does this not mean that if my DNS is a little slow to respond, > > 10 seconds is not "a little slow" to respond. > In my installations 100% of timeouts of 5 seconds were Spam, I tested > that with two other users with a lot of instatllations, they had the > same experience. > But you say, there was an ok mail with timeout, so the default will be > changed. >
Then I'm still a little confused, if 10 seconds isn't to slow and my DNS *is* responding in time, why is SPF timeout being triggered? The SPF information is stored in the TXT record of DNS. This information is retrieved by my DNS, where is the timeout occurring? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
