Hill, Brett wrote: > email is so much better than an html one? Is it because your mail > client doesn't view HTML? I've always been of the opinion that HTML > emails "look" and "format" much cleaner/nicer. Besides the fact that
I ask, what is wrong with good old linefeeds and ">" to show quoted text? If you need nicely formatted text attach a pdf or something. All email is plain text though. It's how a particular client interprets certain codes that we can (ab)use stuff like html, or attachments. This may help answer your question, I am sure one can find many arguments for html email: http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml http://grimthing.com/archives/2004/04/10/why-html-email-is-bad/ http://www.lemis.com/email.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_e-mail Personally I am all for simplicity, in most cases it improves reliability, readability, stability, speed etc. Greetings, Jeroen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
