For the record we use all features *except* Bayesian :) Grey-Listing does rock and made a massive difference.
Horses for courses and all that. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan Jarvis Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 2:26 PM To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy' Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Lite Version of ASSP Agreed. Grey Listing Rocks! Bryan -----Original Message----- Travis Forghani wrote: > So 1.2.0 is just the bayesian and the code for the bayesian hasn't > changed/been improved since? Jeroen wrote: I'd say use 1.3.1 so you can benefit from grey listing. It's by far the most effective, so is a well trained bayesian filter though. But the latter requires more CPU power and requires you to accept the data part of an email in order to check it. Greylisting will defer the email (and most spammers' software won't retry, yet) and as a result there are far less emails to check against the bayesian filter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
