Since I seem to be in the minority here, I'll have to give this matter additional consideration.
Thanks for your input. Best regards, - Phil ---------- Re: [Assp-user] Unknown Addresses cache not being used as spamtrapaddresses despite DoPenaltyMakeTraps setting From: Charles Marcus <CMarcus@Me...> - 2011-05-12 16:15 On 2011-05-12 10:45 AM, Phil Quesinberry wrote: > This is Spam 101 folks, never leak out information as to which email > addresses are valid and which are not. In our case, it's worth having > an average of 94% processor idle time instead of 99%. I question your numbers, but regardless, not performing recipient validation breaks smtp - and risks losing legitimate mail. What will you do when your boss misses an important email because someone typo'd his email address, but didn't know it because you didn't properly reject it, which means the sender never got the NDN? But oh well, your server, your rules... -- Best regards, Charles ---------- Re: [Assp-user] Unknown Addresses cache not being used as spamtrapaddresses de From: Fritz Borgstedt <fb@iw...> - 2011-05-12 15:25 philq@... schreibt: > >This is Spam 101 folks, never leak out information as to which email >addresses are valid and which are not. I do not agree. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
