Well, it still looks like you're just duplicating the inherent 
functionality of ASSP the hard way. ASSP doesn't 'reinject' anything... 
as a transparent proxy, it is always passing the SMTP conversation to 
and from the mailserver.

If I am reading your original message correctly, then the way you 
apparently have your mailserver configured sounds like you have Postfix 
listening on port 25 and 587, and then you use the content_filter to 
pass it off to ASSP which then loops back into another port that Postfix 
is listening on (without content_filter - so you don't have an endless 
loop) which then sends it on to the mail's destination. So you basically 
have Postfix talking to itself, in a loop, with ASSP in the middle.

If that is your setup, then that's definitely the hard way, and 
unnecessary, and I don't see how you can possibly save any resources on 
a high traffic system with it. If you have Postfix doing any sort of 
mail/ip preliminary checks or initial blocking, it's usually quite 
possible to either do those checks in ASSP or specifically configure the 
mailserver to handle the needed checks with ASSP in front of it.

You could indeed implement that same Postfix config with exim, but I 
wouldn't recommend it.

But yes, it's kinda a problem if you're using ASSP v.1. It's been a 
while since I moved to v2, and I don't remember the config changes I had 
to do for the migration. You can, and should, migrate to v2, by 
installing a newer version of perl in /opt and configuring assp to use 
that version (if that's the blocking reason why you're still using v1 
there). Remember to install the necessary cpan packages there too.

But if you're still interested, I can provide my exim-specific assp 
config - basically the network setup - and you can translate it as 
necessary for your v1 setup.

-C


Alexandre de Arruda Paes said the following on 9/1/2014 4:41 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I have about 50 servers with ASSP. With postfix installations (standalone
> or with Zimbra), I use ASSP 2.x as a proxy. But, in high traffic
> enviroments, the best way is to allow MTA to do this job after antispam.
> In this particular server, we use exim instead postfix and ASSP
> 1.9(yes,this is part of the problem). Then, I want to test a similar
> scenario to try avoiding problems with this version of assp. :}
>   Em 01/09/2014 19:03, "Mr. Courtney Creighton" <a...@dezignguy.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> ASSP/Exim does that automatically, just with setting it up properly.
>>
>> Your users sending good mail on port 587 should be authenticated, and
>> ASSP will use that information for the notspam collection and whitelist
>> additions... with the proper settings. It's all automatic, if you have
>> the settings correct. And you don't need to "reinject" mail.
>>
>> And your flow diagrams are incorrect... they should look something like
>> this:
>>
>> Internet -> ASSP proxy (25) -> ASSP (spam test) -> exim -> local delivery
>> Internet -> ASSP proxy (587) -> ASSP (/notspam collect) -> exim -> relay
>> to internet
>>
>> If you need help with setting up the ports in ASSP/Exim, let me know and
>> I'll show you my config for that.
>>
>> -C
>>
>>
>> Alexandre de Arruda Paes said the following on 9/1/2014 1:54 PM:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My skiil in exim are minimal, but I need to use it in one server.
>>> I'm thinking about a way to do the following:
>>>
>>> Internet -> exim (25) -> ASSP (spam test) -> exim -> local delivery
>>> Internet -> exim (587) -> ASSP (/notspam collect) -> exim -> relay to
>>> internet
>>>
>>> If an e-mail come to submission, I use ASSP to collect notspam. If the
>>> e-mail come
>>> to local delivery, ASSP will test e-mail and if it's is ok, reinject to
>>> exim.
>>>
>>> In postifix, this is very easy by setting content_filter in master.cf
>> and
>>> using relay host and relay port in ASSP to reinject e-mail in a port
>>> without content_filter.
>>> But I don't know how to do this in exim.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Slashdot TV.
>>> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
>>> http://tv.slashdot.org/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Assp-user mailing list
>>> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Slashdot TV.
>> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
>> http://tv.slashdot.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-user mailing list
>> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Slashdot TV.
> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
> http://tv.slashdot.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to